Coles forced to boost spending amid shift to online groceries
It’s got the balance sheet to do it, but it lags behind larger rival Woolworths.
If you want to get an idea of Coles’ scale, consider the following statistics. The supermarket retailer has more than 800 stores, employs about 110,000 people, who process over 20 million individual customer transactions a week from Australia's population of 25 million.
And as far as accessibility goes about 80 per cent of the Australian population is less than a 10-minute drive away from the nearest Coles store.
That sounds like grounds for a narrow moat at least. And yet, Coles Group (ASX: COL), Australia’s second largest retailer, is yet to forge a ten-year competitive advantage in the eyes of Morningstar director and retail analyst Johannes Faul.
A key reason is competition. Despite its reach, Coles, which was spun off from Wesfarmers in late 2018, trails market leader Woolworths. The narrow-moat supermarket leader has more than 1000 stores, almost double the workforce of Coles, and does 10 million more transactions per week.
But there’s another reason why Coles is trailing—and that’s to do with its relatively slow progress in selling groceries on the internet.
Coles used its recent Investor Strategy Day to say that its e-commerce continues to outperform its brick-and-mortar food and liquor sales growth. But the online channel requires more capital to support this growth.
Leading on this front are Woolworths Group (ASX: WOW) and the drinks retailer and hospitality company it recently spun off, Endeavour Group (ASX: EDV), which lists on 24 June.
“Coles is currently on the back foot in terms of online sales penetration in food and liquor retailing compared with market leaders Woolworths and Endeavour, respectively,” Faul said in an update following the strategy day.
“Coles’ management guided to a significant increase in capital spending in fiscal 2022 and beyond, most of which is earmarked to improve its digital capabilities and to renew its physical stores.”
Coles (COL) v Woolworths - 3YR
Source: Morningstar Premium; data as of 22 June 2021
At the close on Tuesday, Coles was trading at $16.45, against Faul's fair value estimate of $13, which means it is overvalued by almost 30 per cent.
Faul says Coles has the balance sheet to support its aspirations and maintain its high dividend payout ratio. It has a forward dividend yield of 3.76 per cent. In March this year it paid a fully franked dividend of 33 cents.
“Although we have increased our midcycle net capital expenditure estimate for Coles by almost 50 per cent—with incremental spending averaging some $400 million per year over the next decade—an uplift in our depreciation rate offsets most of the adverse impact on our intrinsic valuation.
“Nevertheless, shares in Coles screen as materially overvalued. All else equal, current shares prices imply operating margins in Coles’ supermarkets segment will expand by about 100 basis points to 5 per cent, compared with our investment thesis of flat EBT margins of 4 per cent long-term. Over the past five years, supermarkets' EBT margins have averaged 4.2 per cent.”
In Australia, consumers still buy virtually all their groceries in-store and Faul expects Australian online grocery sales to remain in the low single digits in the midterm, despite strong online sales growth rates.
Coles leverages its store network as pick-up stations and distribution centres to fulfil online orders. At present, a quarter of orders on Coles' website are click-and-collect, with higher cost delivery orders accounting for the rest of online sales.
Faul says shifts in consumer habits are putting pressure on many traditional brick-and-mortar retailers to increase their spending to protect market share.
“By building an online sales channel in addition to an existing physical store base, the cost base increases, and profit margins weaken unless total sales increase.”