Attractive ASX opportunity with high yield
This REIT is undervalued after selloff despite interest-rate and vacancy headwinds.
Mentioned: BWP Trust (BWP)
We retain our $3.80 fair value estimate for no-moat BWP Trust BWP and consider the REIT to be undervalued after recent unit price weakness. BWP trades at a 13% discount to fair value and net tangible asset backing and offers a decent yield of 5.5%. While there are some headwinds from rising costs of debt and vacancies, we forecast distribution growth of 1.5% per year on average for the medium term. With a solid yield, moderate growth potential, defensive revenue, and conservative financial leverage, this small REIT appeals.
We forecast a relatively strong revenue compound annual growth rate of 7.1% for the five years to fiscal 2029, underpinned by the recent Newmark Property REIT acquisition and solid rent growth. Rents on roughly half of leases have fixed rental uplifts averaging 3% per year, and most of the rest are linked to the Consumer Price Index. These factors should offset vacancies from key tenant Bunnings leaving older stores. BWP’s average lease term is relatively short at 3.8 years as of June 2024, and it has a large number of lease expirations in fiscal 2026 and 2027. However, we think Bunnings will stay at most locations, and vacated properties can be redeveloped for other tenants or sold. This trend has been going on for a few years and is a modest headwind.
The other main headwind is rising borrowing costs, particularly after financial leverage increased with the Newmark acquisition. BWP doesn’t have much hedging, so we expect its cost of debt to rise to about 5.8% within a few years, from roughly 4.5% in fiscal 2024. This detracts from earnings and distribution growth.
Business strategy and outlook
For over 20 years, BWP Trust has consistently applied a strategy of generating rental income from long duration leases over warehouse properties predominantly tenanted by home improvement retail business, Bunnings. Although BWP Trust is proposing to transition some Bunnings Warehouse stores to alternative uses, strategy is to have 80%-90% of rental income from Bunnings. Wide-moat Wesfarmers owns 100% of Bunnings and 23% of BWP Trust, and is the trust's responsible entity.
Concentration risk from having Bunnings as its primary tenant is less of a concern given the benefits from having a strong and growing tenant. Bunnings is well managed and dominates the industry in Australia. Also, home improvement retailing is typically resilient to the business cycle. We also like that Wesfarmers divested its Australian grocery business Coles and sold its home improvement business in the UK, making Bunnings its key growth business. Wesfarmers stated intention is to open 10 to 14 Bunnings stores per year into the foreseeable future and invest in upgrading its existing Bunnings properties, including those owned by the trust.
Rental income generally grows on a like-for-like basis a little over the Australian inflation rate as measured by the consumer price index, or CPI. Leases are typically for an initial period of 10 to 12 years, with multiple options to renew for a further five to six years. The lease terms provide for annual rental growth linked to CPI or for a fixed annual rate typically about 3%. They also provide for midlease market rent reviews, which usually have a cap-and-collar that limits the rent increase/decrease to 10%. Lease terms have been getting worse lately as Bunnings flexes its strong bargaining power over the trust.
BWP bulls say
- BWP’s core properties are key to Bunnings’ business, and provide the foundations for a defensive rental income stream that underpin growing distributions.
- Wesfarmers’ focus on its Bunnings business has the potential to lead to upgrades and acquisition opportunities which could foster further incremental rental income.
- BWP’s warehouse properties have low capital maintenance expenditures that allow the trust to maintain a high distribution payout ratio without the need to access capital markets.
BWP bears say
- BWP’s external management and fee structure may incentivize future management to acquire overvalued properties that destroy securityholder value.
- Bunnings continues to vacate some of BWP's older, smaller properties, resulting in higher vacancies and a drag on earnings.
- Higher interest rates also weigh on the distribution outlook.
Get Morningstar insights in your inbox
Terms used in this article
Star Rating: Our one- to five-star ratings are guideposts to a broad audience and individuals must consider their own specific investment goals, risk tolerance, and several other factors. A five-star rating means our analysts think the current market price likely represents an excessively pessimistic outlook and that beyond fair risk-adjusted returns are likely over a long timeframe. A one-star rating means our analysts think the market is pricing in an excessively optimistic outlook, limiting upside potential and leaving the investor exposed to capital loss.
Fair Value: Morningstar’s Fair Value estimate results from a detailed projection of a company's future cash flows, resulting from our analysts' independent primary research. Price To Fair Value measures the current market price against estimated Fair Value. If a company’s stock trades at $100 and our analysts believe it is worth $200, the price to fair value ratio would be 0.5. A Price to Fair Value over 1 suggests the share is overvalued.
Moat Rating: An economic moat is a structural feature that allows a firm to sustain excess profits over a long period. Companies with a narrow moat are those we believe are more likely than not to sustain excess returns for at least a decade. For wide-moat companies, we have high confidence that excess returns will persist for 10 years and are likely to persist at least 20 years. To learn about finding different sources of moat, read this article by Mark LaMonica.