Don't let your profits go "woof" in the Year of the Dog
As we enter the Year of the Dog, it is fair to say the Chinese zodiac has something to teach us about investing--not so much about when to buy into the equity market, but as to how long.
A very "Xīnnián hao" to you, as this month's Chinese new year zodiac moves from the Rooster to the Year of the Dog.
The 12-year repeating nature of Chinese astrology interests us here, as this is just the sort of time horizon that should be in people's minds if they are planning to invest in the stock market.
If you look back over almost 150 years of history, as the following chart illustrates, the best indicator of the future return of shares is how much investors paid for them, relative to the profits those businesses paid.
10-year annualised returns from different starting cyclically-adjusted P/E (CAPE)*

Source: Stock market data used in "Irrational Exuberance" Princeton University Press, 2015, updated. Robert J. Shiller. Based on US equity market - since 1871.
As you can see, companies valued between 0-7 times their earnings return, on average, nearly double that of companies valued at between 7-14 times their earnings. And returns only get worse the higher the valuation.
These are, however, just average returns and you will only get to see such numbers if you are willing and able to hold your investments for the long term.
Regardless of what your horoscope might have suggested, if you dip in and out of the stock market, you might well be fortunate enough to avoid a bad year or two but, by the same token, you might just as easily miss out on some very good years.
Let's put that idea into perspective with some actual numbers. The main US stock-market index, the S&P 500, has delivered the equivalent of a 10 per cent return every year for 90 years, the effect of which has been to compound an initial investment of $100 into some $399,000--providing that money had stayed invested for the whole period.
In short, in order to compound your wealth, you need to be invested for the long term.
A pig's ear investment?
To underline that point, consider what would have happened if--blessed with perfect foresight, or a really good astrologer--you had only invested in the S&P 500 during the Chinese "animal year" that has provided the best average return since 1928, each time it came around.
As the following chart shows, that has been the Year of the Pig--which seems an appropriate enough name for value investors, who only buy unloved stocks (technically it's the art of buying stocks which trade at a significant discount to their intrinsic value).
Average S&P500 returns during the Chinese animal year since 1928

Source: www.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/data.html February 2018
Over the last 90 years, then, the Year of the Pig has averaged a 20.5 per cent return--well ahead of the market average of 12 per cent.
As such, if you had only invested in "Pig" years, keeping your money in government bonds the rest of the time, you would have made 161x your initial investment. Furthermore, you would have avoided the 25 per cent drop of 1930 and the 44 per cent fall of 1931, respectively the years of the Horse and the Ram.
All of which may have you wondering when the Year of the Pig next trots around--and, for what it is worth, you do only have 12 months to wait. Bear in mind, of course, that past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
The far more important point to take from this exercise, however, is that, if you had been patient and kept your money invested in the S&P 500 from 1928--including the lowly-returning Snake and Horse years--you would have returned very nearly 4,000x your initial investment.
More from Morningstar
Nick Kirrage is an equity value fund manager at Schroders. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.
© 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.