How retirement spending affects withdrawal rates

Christine Benz  |  10/04/2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
email_fwd

Christine Benz: Hi, I'm Christine Benz for Morningstar.com. How does spending change over retirees' life cycles, and what are the implications for safe withdrawals rates? Joining me to discuss that topic is financial planning expert Michael Kitces.

Michael, thank you so much for being here.

Michael Kitces: Thanks, Christine. It's good to be here.

Benz: You and a colleague wrote a piece about retirees' spending patterns looking at how retirees spend over their own life cycles. So, I know there's a body of research in this area. Let's talk about what the data tell us and talk specifically about how when you look at the data you do tend to see spending trail off a little bit as people get older.

Kitces: Yeah. So, there has been a lot of interesting data that's starting to come forth over the past five and 10 years, some very good national data sets that look at spending behaviour patterns and even now some major financial institutions that can like literally look internally--how do all their bank customers behave. And we're learning some interesting stuff. The prevailing view has always been people want to live a stable standard of living in retirement. I mean, the whole essence of a pension is built around you're going to get the same check every year for life, hopefully, it's an inflation-adjusted check, like at least an inflation-adjusted standard of living is going to remain constant throughout retirement. And now, we're digging into the data and we're finding out it's not what people actually do.

So, your colleague actually here at Morningstar, David Blanchett, did a nice slice of this data a couple of years ago and found this effect where when we look at inflation-adjusted spending what we find is, as people get older, the spending trails off. It trails off by about 1 per cent a year through our 60s, 2 per cent a year through our 70s, and then another 1 per cent a year through our 80s. So, if you, kind of, draw that, it goes negative, more negative and then a little less negative. So, David called it like a smile, retirement spending smile.

Benz: Healthcare expenses at the end, right?

Kitces: Right. So, early on our spending slows down a little as our lifestyle slows down. In the middle, our lifestyle slows down a lot. We get kind of the slow-go years, much less traveling, discretionary expenses fall off. And then even in our 80s the spending still trails off. So, inflation-adjusted it starts slowing down by less, but even in our 80s the data is showing that the average household spending continues to decline in our 80s even with the uptick of healthcare because the other stuff, mostly kind of our discretionary buckets, slows down even more. So, yeah, I have more healthcare spending, but we only need one car now. Those kinds of trade-offs that start shifting in the household means the spending continues to slow down even in the later years.

Benz: OK. Let's take a look at the implications then for sustainable withdrawal rates, because a lot of the research there, sort of, assumes that, oh, yes, I'm going to need 4 per cent and then I'm going to inflation-adjust that dollar amount over time, and it assumes a fairly stable level of consumption when in fact the data don't necessarily support that.

Kitces: Yeah. The early safe withdrawals rate study--I mean, I've been guilty of this as someone that published to that literature as well--we were all essentially looking at replicating pension streams of income which were stable inflation-adjusting streams of income, and so we shot for the same thing in a lot of the research. Now we get all this data coming forth that says, well, actually people's behavior doesn't match that.

So, we actually re-ran some of the numbers and published a study a couple of weeks ago about what does it look like when you actually assume decreasing spending by something like maybe 1 per cent a year through retirement or 10 per cent a decade or like maybe we stay steady for the first decade but then we slowdown in the second and third. And what we found, I mean, no great surprise, your withdrawal rate gets a little higher when you assume spending decreases.

Now, the interesting effect is, it's actually not as much of a boost as maybe you would think. If you imagine spending going down by 1 per cent or 2 per cent a year for 30 years, like that cuts 30 per cent to 40 per cent off your inflation-adjusted spending by the end. So, it's a big number. But what we found is the safe withdrawal rate only goes up a little. It goes from 4 per cent to maybe something like 4.4 per cent to 4.8 per cent. So, we get maybe a 10 per cent or 20 per cent increase in safe withdrawal rate for what could actually be a 30 per cent or 40 per cent decrease in cumulative spending.

Benz: And what sort of asset allocation do you assume there?

Kitces: So, we look at over a range of asset allocations, what we generally find is balanced portfolios really do still work the best where we can rely on the interest and the dividends and the capital gains and tapping the principal when we need to. The good news of diversified portfolios is there's always something that we can tap from year to year to generate the cash flows and that still matters. Too conservative, inflation is damaging; too aggressive, market volatility is damaging. But when we get back to those balanced portfolios, generally in the 40-60 to 60-40 kind of range, we would find these effects where your initial safe withdrawal rate lifts up some, but not a huge amount, in part because even though your spending declines, it's only in the later years. So, kind of, cumulatively over a retirement, your spending does decrease quite as much. And the effect that we still have to deal with good old-fashioned sequence risk.

You might realize, hey, yeah, I'm not probably going to do as much world cruising when I'm 80, but unfortunately if you do lots when you're in your 60s and there's a bear market and you run out of money, it doesn't really matter that you're going to do less travel in your 80s because you might have no money left. And so, that need to have a little bit of conservatism in the early years to defend against sequence risk is part of--even if we assume spending goes down a bit, we don't quite get as much of an offsetting increase in the initial safe withdrawal rate, because we still have to hedge a little against that sequence risk.

Benz: OK. Fascinating research, Michael. Thank you so much for being here to discuss it with us.

Kitces: My pleasure. Thanks for having me.

Benz: Thanks for watching. I'm Christine Benz for Morningstar.com.

Video Archive...

Should investors be concerned by North Korea?
25/09/2017  Mark Williams, manager of the UK-based Liontrust Asia Income fund, talks about Kim Jong Un, Donald Trump, and the impact on stock market returns.
Did lack of transparency cause the financial crisis?
19/09/2017  Ten years after the collapse of Northern Rock, Andy Agathangelou tells Emma Wall that greater transparency in financial services could ward off a second global financial crisis.
Are we facing another Global Financial Crisis?
19/09/2017  Ten years on from the collapse of Northern Rock, Dan Kemp tells Emma Wall how there are echoes of the crisis in markets today.
Wild ride in FY17 and more to come - part 2
13/09/2017  Morningstar's Peter Warnes discusses how you may want to position your portfolio in FY18, as geopolitical storms continue to rage and safe-haven assets feel the effects.
Wild ride in FY17 and more to come - part 1
12/09/2017  Cost-out remained a dominant theme for large-cap Australian companies in FY17, and looking ahead to FY18, they should be clearer on cap-ex, says Peter Warnes, Morningstar’s head of equities research – Australasia.
Deeper demand driving these pooled investments
31/08/2017  Listed investment trusts are beginning to take off in Australia, but exactly what are they and how do they differ from listed investment companies and managed funds?
Upbeat Woolies result tempered by Big W
30/08/2017  Woolworths' category-topping FY17 result driven by surprisingly strong sales, even as sector faces tougher times ahead, explains Morningstar's Johannes Faul.
Coke Amatil 1H17 result leaves margin of safety
28/08/2017  A challenged earnings announcement from Coca-Cola's Australian-listed business was largely expected, but downside is already priced in and improvements are expected in FY18.
How slashed Telstra dividend affects our outlook
23/08/2017  Brian Han remains reasonably positive on the telco giant even after some disappointments in the FY17 earnings announcement.
Earnings season FY17 mixed bag so far
18/08/2017  Aside from a few high-profile earnings guidance misses, large-cap stocks are doing okay as FY17 reporting season passes halfway, says AMP chief economist Shane Oliver.
Rio Tinto posts mixed result for 1H17
10/08/2017  An interim result of US$3.9 billion in net profits after tax for one of the world's largest mining companies was positive but slightly weaker than expected, even alongside a record dividend, explains Morningstar's Mat Hodge.
Kerr Neilson on why global investment exposure is key
07/08/2017  There are two types of investors, regardless of market noise, imputation credits, diversification approaches and market indices, says the managing director of Platinum Asset Management.
Finding fixed income opportunities in new paradigm
02/08/2017  Slowing economic growth in the US and parts of Europe emphasises the need to carefully select credit opportunities, says Vincent Reinhart, chief economist, Standish Mellon Asset Management.
Telstra won't be blown away by headwinds
17/07/2017  While it faces what Morningstar equity analyst Brian Han describes as a whirlwind of negatives, he suggests investors shouldn’t hang up on Telstra.
The home-truths of investing
12/07/2017  Look for companies that sit outside the cycle; heed the lessons of history; and remember the power of compounding, says Bennelong's Neale Goldston-Morris.
Self-managed super is not Do-it-yourself
03/07/2017  There are a few common pitfalls in running a self-managed super fund that mean trustees shouldn't go it alone entirely, says BT Financial Group's head of financial literacy, Bryan Ashenden.
Investing to protect on the downside
30/06/2017  There are investment strategies you can adopt to mitigate volatility-linked fear and uncertainty in markets, explains Roy Maslen, chief investment officer – Australian equities, AllianceBernstein.
Don’t overdo benchmark consideration
28/06/2017  Being benchmark agnostic is the most effective approach to fixed income investing, according to Anujeet Sareen, portfolio manager, Brandywine Global.
Factor-based investing using ETFs
26/06/2017  Investors should consider style-exposures--such as value, defensive or yield-- they would like in their portfolios, explains Jonathan Shead, head of portfolio strategists – Asia Pacific, State Street Global Advisors
Volatility plays to active manager strengths
--  The climate of political volatility in the US holds important implications for investors and the funds they invest in, particularly around Donald Trump's ability to pass legislation through Congress, says Pimco's Libby Cantrill.